Sergeant John’s 3-D Chiller House of Terror!

No Handball Playing In This Area

The Aristocrats

Posted on | February 13, 2007

UCLA professor Philip Agre described in 2004 the essential conflict between conservatism and democracy, correctly identifying the former with feudalism, and pointing out where the real elitism and sense of entitlement lies:

The opposite of conservatism is democracy, and contempt for democracy is a constant thread in the history of conservative argument. Instead, conservatism has argued that society ought to be organized in a hierarchy of orders and classes and controlled by its uppermost hierarchical stratum, the aristocracy. Many of these arguments against egalitarianism are ancient, and most of them are routinely heard on the radio. One tends to hear the arguments in bits and pieces, for example the emphatic if vague claim that people are different. Of course, most of these arguments, if considered rationally, actually argue for meritocracy rather than for aristocracy. Meritocracy is a democratic principle…

Conservative remapping of the language of aristocracy and democracy has been incredibly thorough. Consider, for example, the terms “entitlement” and “dependency”. The term “entitlement” originally referred to aristocrats. Aristocrats had titles, and they thought that they were thereby entitled to various things, particularly the deference of the common people. Everyone else, by contrast, was dependent on the aristocrats. This is conservatism. Yet in the 1990’s, conservative rhetors decided that the people who actually claim entitlement are people on welfare. They furthermore created an empirically false association between welfare and dependency. But, as I have mentioned, welfare is precisely a way of eliminating dependency on the aristocracy and the cultural authorities that serve it. I do not recall anyone ever noting this inversion of meaning.

Conservative strategists have also been remapping the language that has historically been applied to conservative religious authorities, sticking words such as “orthodoxy”, “pious”, “dogma”, and “sanctimonious” to liberals at every turn.

Comments

Comments are closed.

Why, oh why?

This is a new look for my site, a lighter and less claustrophobic style unlikely to frighten children or livestock. It contains zero trans fat and no bovine growth hormone (BGH). The 3-D Chiller House of Terror is not intended to treat any disease. Your results may vary. Please consult your doctor before reading any new blog.

Subscribe to our feed

Search

Admin

US Deaths in Iraq since March 20th, 2003

Bad Behavior has blocked 26 access attempts in the last 7 days.