That Would’ve Been Awful
Posted on | December 30, 2006
From former SecState James Baker’s new book, on the subject of the first Gulf War:
…If Saddam were captured and his regime toppled, American forces would still have been confronted with the specter of a military occupation of indefinite duration to pacify a country and sustain a government in power. The ensuing urban warfare would surely have resulted in more casualties to American GIs than the war itself, thus creating a political firestorm at home. And as much as Saddam’s neighbors wanted to see him gone, they feared Iraq would fragment in unpredictable ways that would play into the hands of the mullahs in Iran, who could export their brand of Islamic fundamentalism with the help of Iraq’s Shiites and quickly transform themselves into a dominant regional power. Finally, the Security Council resolution under which we were operating authorized us to use force only to kick Iraq out of Kuwait, nothing more. As events have amply dem-onstrated, these concerns were valid. I am no longer asked why we did not remove Saddam in 1991!
Comments
One Response to “That Would’ve Been Awful”
Leave a Reply
December 31st, 2006 @ 5:15 pm
That would be James “Fuck the Jews, they don’t vote for us anyway” Baker? Yeah, he’s right on this point, but I can’t wait until we’re rid of this cabal. Baker and Kissinger and Perle and Cheney and Rumsfeld and the whole lot should be rotting in prison, not writing books.